Case Study
When Markowitz breaks: estimation error eats Sharpe alive
Take a 25-asset universe. Run the optimizer with a sample-mean μ and sample-covariance Σ on the first 5 years; allocate per the tangency portfolio. Hold for next 5 years. Realized Sharpe usually disappoints by 30-50% versus in-sample. Why? Sample means have huge standard errors (μ_hat for stocks has σ ≈ 5-10% with 5y of data). Mitigations: (1) Black-Litterman with priors, (2) Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage on Σ, (3) max-weight constraints, (4) resampled efficiency. The Efficient Frontier Lab's constraint controls let you compare unconstrained vs constrained-and-shrunk versions side by side.